Michigan Senate Approves Bill that Would Allow Health Care Providers to Discriminate Against LGBT Patients

1

Support Lawsonry by choosing Free Shipping when you shop at Amazon -- click here!

The Michigan Senate’s Committee on Health Policy approved Senate Bill 975,  a bill that protects health care professionals who wish to discriminate against LGBT individuals “as a matter of conscience.” This includes “religious beliefs, moral convictions, or ethical principles,” and frees health professionals who invoke their conscience from any repercussions. If they refuse to provide life-saving care to an LGBT individual (or, in reality, anyone they deem undeserving of care based on their religious beliefs), they will not be held responsible for what happens.

Basically, there is no legal recourse for anyone harmed as a result of this bill. In fact, the bill also has protections in place that indicate that facilities that choose to discriminate based on “conscience” cannot be denied public funding or grants. This bill serves only to protect discrimination while leaving many people at risk. It is already difficult for LGBT individuals to receive proper health care; Senate Bill 975 stands to make the situation worse. With this bill, gay, bisexual, and trans* patients can be denied any type of care, from basic checkups to STD testing.

Unfortunately, this is not the first time we have seen something like this. For instance, a group of nurses in New Jersey filed a lawsuit against the University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey after they were no longer allowed to abstain from caring for patients who have had an abortion. In Kansas (and several other states, including Ohio, Oklahoma, and Arizona), a bill was proposed that would allow doctors to withhold information that may lead a woman to consider having an abortion, such as evidence that there are abnormalities in the fetus. The bill also protected such doctors from being  sued for lying to their patients.

Although it can be difficult to view situations objectively, especially when it comes to religious beliefs, but there are certain professions for which this is absolutely necessary. If health care professionals cannot see past their biases, they should not be in the health care profession, period. There should be no exceptions for this. They cannot decide that someone is unworthy of care based on their personal beliefs. Doctors and nurses should be concerned with protecting patients, all patients, and not with protecting bigotry.

Share

— Kerry Hogan

Kerry Hogan is an adjunct writing professor at Niagara University. She holds a an MA in English from West Virginia University and a BA in English with minors in Writing and Women's Studies from Niagara University. Her research interests include examining the female voice in modern literature. Generally, Kerry is interested in exploring how issues of gender affect the classroom environment.

  • Greg Reed

    This is the TEAvangelical movement that is pushing their Theocratic Evangelical Agenda over the Constitutional rights of all citizens to have fair and equal treatment under the law. It is the steady and slow destruction of the Constitution by the social conservatives to overthrow our secular governance and replace it with their narrow religious opinions. It is not only anti-Constitutional, it is downright un-American and immoral to treat targeted groups of individuals differently from all other legal, law abiding and taxpaying citizens.