The Entitlement Complex of Mass Murdering White Men

It’s been nearly two weeks since the horrific movie theater shooting in Aurora, CO, that left 12 dead and 58 others wounded. In that time, horrified onlookers around the country have been grappling with the most unanswerable question: what caused a seemingly intelligent, moderately successful young white man to meticulously plan and carry out such a gruesome massacre?

There cannot be and will not be any satisfying answers. There simply aren’t any excuses for walking into a crowded theater and indiscriminately killing innocent strangers, some as young as six years old. The answer is going to boil down to the fact that an individual made a selfish and cowardly decision to act out in a way that resulted in mass murder.

Unsurprisingly, the conclusion that many have already drawn is that the shooter is certainly “sick” and “needs help.” And while that may be a contributing factor, the overwhelming majority of people who are mentally ill do not go out and commit horrific crimes. For that to happen, a number of factors need to be at play, including – and probably most importantly – privilege and power.

Above Suspicion

The first ingredient for this disaster that seems to have been swept under the rug is that in order to be able to plan out and prepare for such an attack, one must be above suspicion, at least to some degree. James Holmes, the Colorado shooter, was a PhD student who kept to himself and had no previous history of violence or trouble with the law. According to law enforcement, there were no obvious red flags about Holmes beyond the arsenal that he bought online and had delivered to his house.

And that’s precisely the problem; by allowing white people – and white men in particular – the constant benefit of the doubt, law enforcement at large is not only unduly harassing people of color, but allowing dangerous would-be killers to slip through the cracks. Had Holmes had a Muslim name, there is no doubt that federal intelligence agencies and law enforcement would have been immediately alerted to the unusual activity. Take for instance, Najibullah Zazi, a Muslim immigrant and Afghan national also living in Aurora. In 2009, Zazi emailed a contact in Pakistan about a baking recipe for an upcoming marriage. The FBI had discovered that marriage was a code word for terrorist plot, so they tailed, investigated, phone-tapped, and eventually arrested Zazi with zero casualties. Zazi has since admitted to masterminding a foiled terror attack on the New York City subway system.

That was a correct use of intelligence to avert disaster. In New York and New Jersey, it has been discovered that the NYPD was operating well outside of its jurisdiction. The police were infiltrating Muslim mosques, student groups, and community organizations as far away from the city as Rutgers, profiling “suspects” in ways which were not only racist but that appear to have been fruitless. New York City law enforcement is also coming under fire for racial profiling in their “Stop and Frisk” crime prevention initiative. Of the nearly 700,000 New Yorkers who were stopped and frisked, 87% were Black or Hispanic, despite the fact that the majority of New York’s population is white.

Is there any doubt that it’s easier for white people to commit violent crimes?

It seems likely that if Holmes had been a person of color, law enforcement (or at the very least his neighbors) would have paid more attention to the odd behavior and package deliveries that seem sinister in retrospect. Perhaps they would have even heeded the “If you see something, say something” dictum that followed the 9/11 attacks.

Rampage Killers: Disproportionately White and Male

While the majority of all violent crimes are perpetuated by men, American mass murders in particular seem to be the territory of white men. The Encyclopedia of Murder and Violent Crime writes that, “Compared with assailants who kill but one victim, mass murderers are overwhelmingly likely to be male, [and] are far more likely to be white,” and the numbers prove it. According to Wikipedia, 75% of the rampage killings on US record were perpetrated by white males, as were 71% of massacres in schools, and 60% of workplace rampages – a seriously disproportionate number for the number of white males that make up the general population. Clearly, there is more at play here than the advantage of opportunity.

Historically, the focus on serial killers and mass murderers has been on the individual motives for the crimes, and little on the overarching trend. It’s plausible that the elevated social status of white males combined with isolation, desperation, opportunity, and mental illness has led the white men who have gone on rampages to make their pain felt by those around them in a very violent way. 

 Of course, it isn’t just male privilege that makes men more prone to violent crime than their female counterparts. From the time they are toddlers, men are socialized to express their emotions through violence. Western culture – and especially American culture – teaches boys that emotional intelligence and expression is worthless and effeminate, and that the acceptable masculine response to anger, sadness, and/or frustration is to act out physically. If this mentality is particularly deeply rooted in an individual man, he may find it incredibly difficult to form an emotional support system, leading to more self-inflicted and outwardly motivated violence among men.

What Can We Learn?

Fortunately, rampage killings are as rare as they are horrific. Unfortunately, it makes them incredibly hard to predict, especially if law enforcement and news outlets refuse to acknowledge the patterns and systemic roots of such violence. Until more people are willing to enter into an honest conversation about the deadly side effects of white male privilege, more James Holmes’s are not just a scary thought, they’re inevitable. 

  • H

    although sin most definitely has a point, I’m just going to point out that, if 72.5% of the people in the us are white, then that’s 36% that are white and also male. 75% of mass murders being perpetrated by 36% of the population is probably a disproportion no matter how you spin it.

  • Donnie

    This is an awful article filled with unfalsifiable assumptions and I’m seriously questioning the author’s credentials.

    Attributing this to “white male privilege” is absurd when you consider this happens elsewhere in the world by non-whites and has also happened in western countries by non-whites and females to a lesser degree.

    Was Seung-Hui Cho experiencing Asian male privilege when he shot up Virginia teach? Was Laura Sorenson experiencing female privilege when she targeted men for murder in Florida?

    The common denominator is far more likely to be a history of social exclusion and mental health issues.

    • CPB

      You list two outliers and not the majority of perpetrators which do happen to be overwhelmingly white males. The above article is obviously addressing mass murder in the United States, not world wide. Finally, there is good reason to believe that cultural pressure (failure to live up to the he-man American social construct [aka ostracism]) is a determining factor. Couple that with male propensity to externalize blame and you have mass murder.

      Oh, and quit basing your counterarguments on anomalies. Academia.edu is a much better source than Wikipedia…or your ass.

      • Sin

        “You list two outliers and not the majority of perpetrators which do happen to be overwhelmingly white [...]”

        Could it possibly be because… whites are the largest ethnic group in most of America? Just a guess.

        I admit it’s plausible that males, for whatever biological, social, or psychological factors, could be shown to be more likely to commit mass murders than females, but attributing mass murdering tendencies to being white, in a country where whites are the largest ethnic group, is pretty laughable. Also kinda racist.

        The article talks about the FBI monitoring Muslims to prevent terrorist attacks, and makes it sound like if the FBI made it a priority to monitor white males as well then they have a better chance of preemptively preventing mass murders? Let me tell you about this neat novel called 1984.

        (Disclaimer: Before anyone gets their panties in a knot over my white privilege or whatever, I’m not.)

        • http://accordingtosami.tumblr.com Sami Lawson

          Did you read the article, Sin? Although white men make up ~30% of the american population, they make up ~70% of those who perpetuate mass murders. So it’s obviously disproportionate. They also (are convicted) of homicide at a much, much lower rate than blacks. Much of that is racism in our justice system, but it is also due to lower poverty levels among white than blacks.

          • Sin

            According to
            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States#Race_and_ethnicity whites make up 72.5% of America’s population which corresponds nicely to the percentage of mass murderers who are white males. Without a statistic for the percentage of mass murderers who are female (something that the article should really have included for a complete and unbiased view) we can’t say how much of a factor gender is; for the sake of argument let’s take it to the extreme and assume almost all mass murders are committed by males (from a glance at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rampage_killers:_Americas this seems likely). Given these assumptions and normalizing race by population size, it becomes plausible that race actually plays a very small role.

            I don’t know if the author intentionally presented the statistics misleadingly to prove her point or if she’s just not aware of standard practices in scientific analysis. When talking about the prevalence of social phenomena in different groups, usually the measurement is occurrences per {thousand, hundred thousand, million, etc.} people so as to normalize the occurrences across all groups. For example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Homicide_offending_by_race.jpg and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:U.S._incarceration_rates_1925_onwards.png. It’s also very misleading to not include the statistics for females when gender is cited as a factor.